Los Angeles Times
Tuesday, January 30, 2001

Parents Should Know Both the Benefits and Risks of Vaccinations

By ERIC L. HURWITZ

    According to recent medical findings, many parents believe that childhood vaccines are unsafe and seek exemptions from school mandates. Because unvaccinated children put themselves and others at greater risk of highly contagious diseases that can be prevented by vaccines, it is worth exploring the possible origins of these beliefs and whether they are scientifically justified.
    If vaccines cause harm to some children, and if we cannot accurately predict which kids will be hurt, then mass vaccination programs, by necessity, protect the public's health at their expense. Should the risks and benefits to the child and the public of receiving or not receiving each vaccine be disclosed by a physician in a way that the parent understands the inherent uncertainty of risk and voluntarily makes a decision to accept or refuse the vaccinations?
    In the U.S., vaccine safety has historically taken a back seat to development and rapid deployment. Remarkably, even today, we lack procedures for the systematic collection of valid long-term safety data. Documented cases of abuse of power, unethical studies and vaccine-induced injury and death may contribute to parents' conceptions.
    Evidence of conflicts of interest involving U.S. Food and Drug Administration advisory panel members, the withdrawal of the recently approved vaccine for rotavirus (responsible for severe diarrhea), changes in the hepatitis B vaccine schedule because of possible harm from a mercury-containing preservative and reports from the Institute of Medicine are also likely reasons for concern. The institute concluded that the measles-mumps-rubella and hepatitis B vaccines may cause anaphylaxis, a life-threatening allergic reaction, and the causes of many other adverse outcomes could not be determined because of insufficient data.
    Moreover, a recent study suggests that the most widely used current vaccines for whooping cough may be linked with anaphylaxis, while surveillance of the chickenpox vaccine revealed anaphylaxis, encephalopathy (a disorder affecting the brain) and other reactions. Links of the measles-mumps-rubella vaccine and other immunizations with autism have been neither proved nor disproved because of inadequate data.
    Similarly, little is known about the potential long-term consequences of multiple and combination vaccines typically administered to American children. Findings from both animal and human studies suggest that vaccinations are one of many genetic and environmental factors that contribute to the increase in allergic disease. Thus, because of how vaccines are tested and marketed, without large, long-term pre-approved safety studies before widespread public school use, lack of confidence in vaccine safety may not be a misconception, but a scientifically justifiable concern.
    In fact, written informed consent may be warranted because there is insufficient data to accurately estimate the risks; current investigatory systems are not designed to assess the risks of rare events or adverse outcomes with long latent periods; and post-marketing surveillance is arguably research as defined by U.S. code. Because mandatory immunization policies preclude voluntary informed consent, there is in many cases a lack of trust and shared decision-making between parents and their child's physician.
    Any potential unintended consequences of current and future vaccinations need to be acknowledged and adequately addressed through the sharing of data, resources and expertise by government agencies, vaccine manufacturers, researchers and policymakers.
    Until we can predict which children are at risk from current and future vaccines, voluntary, written informed consent rather than coercion through mandates may help to restore parents' trust and maintain the public's health.
                                                                                                - - -
Eric L. Hurwitz Is an Assistant Professor at UCLA's School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology
 

References:

    1. Feikin DR, Lezotte DC, Hamman RF, Salmon DA, Chen RT, Hoffman RE. Individual and community risks of measles and pertussis associated with personal exemptions to immunization. JAMA 2000; 284:3145-3150.
    2. Gellin BG, Maibach EW, Marcuse EK. Do parents understand immunizations? A national telephone survey. Pediatrics 2000; 106:1097-1102.
    3. Baker JP. Immunization and the American way: 4 childhood vaccines. Am J Publ Health 2000; 90:199-207.
    4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Withdrawal of rotavirus vaccine recommendation. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1999; 48:1007.
    5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Recommendations regarding the use of vaccines that contain thimerosal as a preservative. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1999; 48:996-998.
    6. McCarthy M. Conflict of interest taints vaccine approval process, charges U.S. report. Lancet 2000; 356:838.
    7. Lonergan G, Rivest P. What is a safe vaccine? Vaccine 2000; 19:1.
    8. Howson CP, Howe CJ, Fineberg HV. Adverse Effects of Pertussis and Rubella Vaccines: A Report of the Committee to Review the Adverse Consequences of Pertussis and Rubella Vaccines. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1991.
    9. Stratton KR, Howe CJ, Johnston RB. Adverse Events Associated with Childhood Vaccines: Evidence Bearing on Causality. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1994.
  10. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Pertussis vaccination: Use of acellular pertussis vaccines among infants and young children. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1997; 46:4.
  11. Nakayama T, Aizawa C, Kuno-Sakai H. A clinical analysis of gelatin allergy and determination of its causal relationship to the previous administration of gelatin-containing acellular pertussis vaccine combined with diphtheria and tetanus toxoids. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1999; 103:321-325.
  12. Wise RP, Salive ME, Braun MM, Mootrey GT, Seward JF, Rider LG, Krause PR. Postlicensure safety surveillance for varicella vaccine. JAMA 2000; 284:1271-1279.
  13. Kosecka U, Berin MC, Perdue MH. Pertussis adjuvant prolongs intestinal hypersensitivity. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 1999; 119:205-211.
  14. Parronchi P, Brugnolo F, Sampognaro S, Maggi E. Genetic and environmental factors contributing to the onset of allergic disorders. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2000; 121:2-9.
  15. Singleton JA, Lloyd JC, Mootrey GT, et al., for the VAERS Working Group. An overview of the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) as a surveillance system. Vaccine 1999; 17:2908-2917.
  16. Braun MM, Ellenberg SS. Descriptive epidemiology of adverse events following immunization: reports to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, 1991-1994. J Pediatr 1997; 131:529-535.
  17. Jefferson T. Real or perceived adverse effects of vaccines and the media–a tale of our times. J Epidemiol Community Health 2000; 54:402-403.
  18. Title 45, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 46.
  19. Davis MM, Lantos JD. Ethical considerations in the public policy laboratory. JAMA 2000; 284:85-87.
  20. Kerpelman LC, Connell DB, Gunn WJ. Effect of a monetary sanction on immunization rates of recipients of aid to families with dependent children. JAMA 2000; 284:53-59.
  21. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Impact of vaccines universally recommended for children–United States, 1900-1998.  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1999; 48:243-248.
 

Letters to the Editor in response to commentary:

Los Angeles Times
Sunday, February 4, 2001

Childhood Vaccines

     Eric L. Hurwitz's Jan. 30 commentary on vaccinations was well-titled ("Parents Should Know Both the Benefits and Risks of Vaccinations") but quickly lost focus. The balancing of medical risks is one of the hardest things for a doctor to explain to a new parent. Asking parents to sign consent forms is not a bad idea, but consent is not the same thing as informed consent.
     No vaccine carries a 100% guarantee of safety. While parents need to know the risks involved in any vaccination, they also ought to know the risks in not vaccinating: epidemics of infectious disease. The United Kingdom has a rising number of measles cases, primarily due to growing parental refusal of the measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine. And these diseases are not just minor annoyances--they can be serious, debilitating, even deadly.
     The MMR vaccine may never be proven totally safe. But we will never be safe from these diseases without it. Parents should at least be told that.
  HOWARD FIENBERG
  Statistical Assessment Service
  Washington